24/11 – WELSH IDENTITY DAY

Well it’s new to me too, ‘Wales Identity Day’ I can’t decide whether it’s derisive: on a par with English, “they all started speaking Welsh when I walked into the pub”; or, whether it is a serious attempt to catalogue a different culture, belonging to a distinct nationality.
What ever you opinion, here are some of the results from the BBC News Online: link
Miners, choirs, leeks and sheep are all stereotypical images of Wales but what do people in the four regions of the nation think represents their country? Social historian Catrin Stevens posed the question for the Heritage Lottery Fund's (HLF) Wales Identity Day 2006. Results showed a "common bond" of shared passion for Wales but also revealed clear identities in the four regions based on their local heritage. People living in north, mid, west and south Wales were surveyed. The results revealed the very clear identities in the four regions based on their local heritage. People from south east Wales thought their landscape and local heroes stood them apart from the rest of Wales, choosing a miners lamp and rugby ball as symbols of their heritage that should be preserved for the future. They believed the increase in diverse cultures had improved their area for the better over the last 10 years and chose south Wales-born Aneurin Bevan as "ambassador". The Transporter Bridge in Newport and the capital's Millennium Stadium were the most popular heritage icons. Those in mid Wales also placed landscape as the most important element of their heritage but thought the Welsh language was the key to making their region unique. They chose Welsh lamb and the Welsh language as heritage symbols and thought better housing and less unemployment were the two things that had improved most over the last decade. Owain Glyndwr would be their ideal ambassador for the area and the National Library of Aberystwyth and metal mining were the most significant heritage icons. People in west Wales highlighted landscape and mining as the two most important elements of their heritage, choosing a piece of coal and rugby ball as symbolic objects. They thought green areas were better maintained than 10-years-ago but would choose north Wales-born Bryn Terfel as their ambassador. The most iconic landmarks in their area are the Aberdulais Falls and Margam Park. While people in north Wales agreed with their west Walian counterparts in identifying landscape and mining as the most important elements of their heritage, and picked a miner's lamp and a beer barrel as objects that should be preserved for the future. They would choose Aneurin Bevan and Bryn Terfel as ambassadors for the north and see the Pontcysyllte Aqueduct and Llangollen Bridge as their heritage icons. Catrin Stevens who analysed the results, said: "If there's one thing that came across strongly, it was that people the length and breadth of Wales share a strong passion for their heritage, their roots and national identity and they want to share this passion with other people. "Whilst we were interested in finding out what makes each region unique, we were also searching for those common bonds across the country."
And if you want reaction, then here is a link to the BBC News Online, ‘have your say’ facility on the subject: Link
24/11 – TOTALITARIAN LABOUR
There have been an increasing number of news stories that have slipped out into the public domain, of late that strike at the totalitarian and subversive nature of the New Labour machine. Under the guise of terrorism, anti-social behaviour, and various other causes, they are slowly eroding the fundamental basis of democracy in this country. These are some news stories that I have noticed.
BBC NEWS (INTERACTIVE SERVICE) 00.06, 14th November.
Anonymous votes for those at risk.
People whose safety is threatened can vote anonymously for the first time, under new rules to boost turnout.
Domestic violence victims are among those expected to benefit from the changes under the Electoral Administration Act.
Their names will be kept off the Electoral Roll – instead they will be represented by a number.
The changes, finalised on Monday, also see the relaxation of rules for people who have been sectioned under the Mental Health Act.
Now is it just me who believed that the identity of the individual could be protected by withdrawing your name from the edited electoral register. I happen to have a voting registration form on my computer at this present moment and it says “Tick here if you do not want your name to be included on the edited register, which is available for general sale.” Overleaf it continues, “There are two versions of the register – the full version and the edited version. The full register is used for elections and referendums. Preventing and detecting crime, and checking applications for credit. The edited register is available for general sale and can be used for commercial activities such as marketing.”
Now if only the Edited register is for sale, and the Full register is only used for elections, and official business. Why then does it become necessary for the government to introduce anonymous voting?
Even if this government has no subversive intent in this action, it is dangerous that the facility for anonymous voters to be created. If necessary restrict further who can use the full electoral role, but a party could potential win an election on the votes of people who they are not required to prove exist.
Other notable stories include.
TELETEXT 307 NOV 14 20:37:19
Reid plans eviction powers.
New powers to throw homeowners out of their properties within 48 hours for committing anti-social behaviour have been pledged by the Home Secretary.
John Reid indicated he wants to move away from the traditional view that justice has to involve going to court.
He said he instead wants to create new powers to evict people rapidly from homes and other properties which cause persistent anti-social misery.
So its official John Reid wants to create a breed of Judge Dredds to police the streets of Britain, evicting people from their own property, without recourse to a court of law and a jury of peers.
It is wrong for so many reasons, disregarding the right of property, disregarding the trial by jury, creating vigilante police force, with authority to act in such subjective matters as anti-social behaviour. What is anti-social behaviour? Not even the Home Office, have a clear definition, http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/anti-social-behaviour/ preferring the broader anti-social tag in a one-size-fits-all kind of way. This spurious, ill defined, principle could be dangerous, is it anti-social to refuse to sell your land to make way for a hospital? Is it anti-social to refuse a multinational corporation to run a LNG pipeline through the bottom of your garden, even if it could provide cheaper heating to people, especially the elderly and infirm?
And the Queen’s speech was no better, introducing legislation to hold trials without juries in serious fraud trails and institutions that better serve modern democracies? What exactly is an institution that will better serve modern democracy? What is wrong with the current system (apart from the Lords)?
This Labour government is being very cavalier about our democracy and it is time that we all took note and said enough is enough.
24/11 – LLWYNYWORMWOOD ESTATE
Well it was inevitable, a Welsh nationalist and by default a republican* blogger, would eventually comment on the fact that HRH Charles, Prince of Wales, has bought his first residence in Wales.
Apart from the fact that I have an uncontrollable urge to graffiti the word ‘Scrubs’ under the name on the estate ‘LLwynywormwood Scrubs’, well it appealed to my sense of humour. There is a serious issue with his procuring of this property, namely that it is widely thought to boost the local property prices, meaning that more locals are forced out of their locality in the search of affordable housing.
Other problems can be derived from the fact that he is seemingly encouraging the procurement of holiday homes for the rich and famous English*, idyllic homes in rural Wales that will probably be left vacant for large segments of the year, diluting communities, jeopardising local amenities, and in certain areas of Wales endanger the survival of the Welsh language as a viable first language.
This grand gesture by the Prince of Wales, to finally legitimise his position has head of the nation by having a residence in Wales, smacks of a general ignorance of the concerns of the population of Wales, and shows just how out of touch he is.
* Is there a word for some who doesn’t believe in a Presidential (i.e. Republican) system, but rather believes that the prime minister should be head of state? I was toying with the word Parliamentarian, but the definition doesn’t seem to fit.
* Or other nationalities.